[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200121095927.GG20112@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:29:27 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
Parth Shah <parth@...ux.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched, fair: Allow a small load imbalance between low
utilisation SD_NUMA domains v4
* Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net> [2020-01-14 10:13:20]:
> Changelog since V3
> o Allow a fixed imbalance a basic comparison with 2 tasks. This turned out to
> be as good or better than allowing an imbalance based on the group weight
> without worrying about potential spillover of the lower scheduler domains.
>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists