[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200121120348.01399a47@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:03:48 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Cc: artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] tracing: Add trace_synth_event() and related
functions
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:35:13 -0600
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
> +struct synth_event;
> +
> +struct synth_gen_state {
> + struct trace_event_buffer fbuffer;
> + struct synth_trace_event *entry;
> + struct ring_buffer *buffer;
> + struct synth_event *event;
> + unsigned int cur_field;
> + unsigned int n_u64;
> + bool enabled;
> + bool add_next;
> + bool add_name;
> +};
> +
Yes, please rebase on my for-next branch, as the ring_buffer structure
has been renamed, and will break these patches :-/
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists