linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: arm-dmc520.txt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKqC_xm9rrHYaO87BtEv=-ji080p_G8axFduqu1mcqHCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:53:23 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Shiping Ji <shiping.linux@...il.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, hangl@...rosoft.com,
        Lei Wang <lewan@...rosoft.com>, ruizhao@...rosoft.com,
        shji@...rosoft.com, Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>,
        Yuqing Shen <yuqing.shen@...adcom.com>,
        Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>, wangglei@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: arm-dmc520.txt

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:39 PM Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 06:32:27AM -0800, Shiping Ji wrote:
> > This is the device tree bindings for new EDAC driver dmc520_edac.c.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shiping Ji <shiping.linux@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lei Wang <leiwang_git@...look.com>
> > Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
>
> So for this patch, v2 had Rui Zhao as an author:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/BN7PR08MB5572B3388B2D7DC8F6C7F285AE4C0@BN7PR08MB5572.namprd08.prod.outlook.com
>
> v3 got Lei as an author:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CY1PR0401MB1244062C1738B09D6100F202860A0@CY1PR0401MB1244.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
>
> and now it is you.
>
> So when you send next time, think about who's going to be the author.
>
> > +     line numbers. The valid interrupt names are the followings:
>
> WARNING: 'followings' may be misspelled - perhaps 'following'?
> #51: FILE: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/arm-dmc520.txt:10:
> +     line numbers. The valid interrupt names are the followings:
>
> Please integrate scripts/checkpatch.pl into your patch creation
> workflow. Some of the warnings/errors *actually* make sense.
>
> Also, this patch throws this other checkpatch warning:
>
> WARNING: DT bindings should be in DT schema format. See: Documentation/devicetree/writing-schema.rst
>
> but since Rob reviewed it, I'm going to assume checkpatch is wrong here.

Would be happy for a schema, but not going to ask for that on a v9.

Rob