[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=30bpBXqrT6LfwDb+YrTcGtTg5NL34dpc3Vkfe11KvFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:43:06 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@...e.de>
Cc: Michael Reed <mdr@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: qla1280: Fix a use of QLA_64BIT_PTR
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:00 AM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Clang warns:
>
> ../drivers/scsi/qla1280.c:1702:5: warning: 'QLA_64BIT_PTR' is not
> defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
> if QLA_64BIT_PTR
> ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> The rest of this driver uses #ifdef QLA_64BIT_PTR, do the same thing at
> this site to remove this warning.
>
> Fixes: ba304e5b4498 ("scsi: qla1280: Fix dma firmware download, if dma address is 64bit")
^ The above SHA is valid only in linux-next. Won't it change when
merged into mainline?
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/843
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Thanks for the patch.
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/qla1280.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c b/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c
> index 607cbddcdd14..3337cd341d21 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla1280.c
> @@ -1699,7 +1699,7 @@ qla1280_load_firmware_pio(struct scsi_qla_host *ha)
> return err;
> }
>
> -#if QLA_64BIT_PTR
> +#ifdef QLA_64BIT_PTR
Thomas should test this, as it implies the previous patch was NEVER
using the "true case" values, making it in effect a
no-functional-change (NFC).
> #define LOAD_CMD MBC_LOAD_RAM_A64_ROM
> #define DUMP_CMD MBC_DUMP_RAM_A64_ROM
> #define CMD_ARGS (BIT_7 | BIT_6 | BIT_4 | BIT_3 | BIT_2 | BIT_1 | BIT_0)
> --
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists