[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1579634558.19595.5.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:22:38 -0600
From: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/12] tracing: Add trace_synth_event() and related
functions
Hi Steve,
On Tue, 2020-01-21 at 12:03 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 14:35:13 -0600
> Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > +struct synth_event;
> > +
> > +struct synth_gen_state {
> > + struct trace_event_buffer fbuffer;
> > + struct synth_trace_event *entry;
> > + struct ring_buffer *buffer;
> > + struct synth_event *event;
> > + unsigned int cur_field;
> > + unsigned int n_u64;
> > + bool enabled;
> > + bool add_next;
> > + bool add_name;
> > +};
> > +
>
> Yes, please rebase on my for-next branch, as the ring_buffer
> structure
> has been renamed, and will break these patches :-/
>
OK, I'll rebase on for-next, and will also adapt a couple of Masami's
boot trace patches to these.
Thanks,
Tom
> -- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists