linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Improve readability across clk handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:22:30 -0800
From:   Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
To:     Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Ohad Ben Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Improve readability
 across clk handling

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:51 AM Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Define CLKEN and CLKOFF for improving readability of Q6SS clock
> handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>

It took me awhile to wrap my head around how this new define,
Q6SS_CBCR_TIMEOUT_US, sometimes replaces HALT_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS and
sometimes replaces SLEEP_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS. I guess they're conceptually
different but set to the same value for now? And you've fixed up a
place where the wrong one was used? If you thought the distinction was
meaningless I'd also be fine merging these two defines into one.
Either way, assuming the above is intentional, this looks ok to me.
Thanks for renaming that define.

Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>