linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc function syntax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200122152608.40f7c90c@endymion>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 15:26:08 +0100
From:   Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To:     Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc
 function syntax

On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:31:23 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Good point. For v2 I added a new patch to use "Implemented by" also in
> i2c-protocol.rst.

BTW... I don't know how Wolfram feels about it, but I don't think
documentation changes need to be split to such fine-grained patches.
Chances that someone will want to cherry-pick specific changes are very
low in my opinion, so a large number of patches only means more
paperwork with little to no benefit. Some splitting is certainly nice
to make reviews easier, but only to a certain degree.

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support