linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc function syntax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200122153747.GA21343@ninjato>
Date:   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 16:37:47 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:     Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc
 function syntax

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 03:26:08PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 18:31:23 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> > Good point. For v2 I added a new patch to use "Implemented by" also in
> > i2c-protocol.rst.
> 
> BTW... I don't know how Wolfram feels about it, but I don't think
> documentation changes need to be split to such fine-grained patches.

I don't mind too much. I think for a first version, fine grained can
make review more easy. Maybe the second version could be less patches.
Yet for me, since patchwork can handle series of patches, the amount
doesn't matter too much. I am super happy that Luca did the work and you
did the review!


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)