[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c65eb7a-539b-1fa3-f988-40c32aa8dfe3@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:45:53 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Tom Joseph <tjoseph@...ence.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 4/6] dt-bindings: PCI: rcar: Add bindings for R-Car PCIe
endpoint controller
Hi Prabhakar,
On 21/01/20 11:27 PM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Rob/Kishon,
>
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 4:22 PM Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch adds the bindings for the R-Car PCIe endpoint driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml | 76 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..99c2a1174463
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (C) 2020 Renesas Electronics Europe GmbH - https://www.renesas.com/eu/en/
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/rcar-pcie-ep.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Renesas R-Car PCIe Endpoint
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + items:
>> + - const: renesas,r8a774c0-pcie-ep
>> + - const: renesas,rcar-gen3-pcie-ep
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + maxItems: 5
>> +
>> + reg-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: apb-base
>> + - const: memory0
>> + - const: memory1
>> + - const: memory2
>> + - const: memory3
As I had mentioned in the other patch, I'd prefer if we can create
standard binding for representing the memory regions. IMHO we should
create subnode for memory regions Each sub-node itself may or may not
have more than one memory region.
In your platform, since there can be only one allocation in a memory
region, there should be 4 sub-nodes for each of the memory region and
each node should have page_size (or some equivalent property) property
to indicate page_size (= region_size).
For a platform that doesn't have the restriction, there can be a single
sub-node containing all the memory region.
Let's wait for Rob's comment though.
Thanks
Kishon
>> +
>> + power-domains:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + resets:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + clocks:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + clock-names:
>> + items:
>> + - const: pcie
>> +
>> + max-functions:
>> + minimum: 1
>> + maximum: 6
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> + - reg-names
>> + - resets
>> + - power-domains
>> + - clocks
>> + - clock-names
>> + - max-functions
>> +
> apart from dt_binding_check error are we OK with dt bindings ?
>
> Cheers,
> --Prabhakar
>
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/r8a774c0-cpg-mssr.h>
>> + #include <dt-bindings/power/r8a774c0-sysc.h>
>> +
>> + pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@...00000 {
>> + compatible = "renesas,r8a774c0-pcie-ep",
>> + "renesas,rcar-gen3-pcie-ep";
>> + reg = <0 0xfe000000 0 0x80000>,
>> + <0x0 0xfe100000 0 0x100000>,
>> + <0x0 0xfe200000 0 0x200000>,
>> + <0x0 0x30000000 0 0x8000000>,
>> + <0x0 0x38000000 0 0x8000000>;
>> + reg-names = "apb-base", "memory0", "memory1", "memory2", "memory3";
>> + resets = <&cpg 319>;
>> + power-domains = <&sysc R8A774C0_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
>> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 319>;
>> + clock-names = "pcie";
>> + max-functions = /bits/ 8 <1>;
>> + };
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists