[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8th3eysn0s2q9EEAqQb7vfd3bNcL=ow_z8tSWAC6K=iJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 20:54:13 +0000
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
Tom Joseph <tjoseph@...ence.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 4/6] dt-bindings: PCI: rcar: Add bindings for R-Car PCIe
endpoint controller
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:13 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> On 21/01/20 11:27 PM, Lad, Prabhakar wrote:
> > Hi Rob/Kishon,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 4:22 PM Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This patch adds the bindings for the R-Car PCIe endpoint driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml | 76 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..99c2a1174463
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci-ep.yaml
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +# Copyright (C) 2020 Renesas Electronics Europe GmbH - https://www.renesas.com/eu/en/
> >> +%YAML 1.2
> >> +---
> >> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/rcar-pcie-ep.yaml#
> >> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >> +
> >> +title: Renesas R-Car PCIe Endpoint
> >> +
> >> +maintainers:
> >> + - Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >> +
> >> +properties:
> >> + compatible:
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: renesas,r8a774c0-pcie-ep
> >> + - const: renesas,rcar-gen3-pcie-ep
> >> +
> >> + reg:
> >> + maxItems: 5
> >> +
> >> + reg-names:
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: apb-base
> >> + - const: memory0
> >> + - const: memory1
> >> + - const: memory2
> >> + - const: memory3
>
> As I had mentioned in the other patch, I'd prefer if we can create
> standard binding for representing the memory regions. IMHO we should
> create subnode for memory regions Each sub-node itself may or may not
> have more than one memory region.
>
> In your platform, since there can be only one allocation in a memory
> region, there should be 4 sub-nodes for each of the memory region and
> each node should have page_size (or some equivalent property) property
> to indicate page_size (= region_size).
>
> For a platform that doesn't have the restriction, there can be a single
> sub-node containing all the memory region.
>
> Let's wait for Rob's comment though.
>
Gentle ping.on the suggestions above.
Cheers,
--Prabhakar
> Thanks
> Kishon
> >> +
> >> + power-domains:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> + resets:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> + clocks:
> >> + maxItems: 1
> >> +
> >> + clock-names:
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: pcie
> >> +
> >> + max-functions:
> >> + minimum: 1
> >> + maximum: 6
> >> +
> >> +required:
> >> + - compatible
> >> + - reg
> >> + - reg-names
> >> + - resets
> >> + - power-domains
> >> + - clocks
> >> + - clock-names
> >> + - max-functions
> >> +
> > apart from dt_binding_check error are we OK with dt bindings ?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > --Prabhakar
> >
> >> +examples:
> >> + - |
> >> + #include <dt-bindings/clock/r8a774c0-cpg-mssr.h>
> >> + #include <dt-bindings/power/r8a774c0-sysc.h>
> >> +
> >> + pcie0_ep: pcie-ep@...00000 {
> >> + compatible = "renesas,r8a774c0-pcie-ep",
> >> + "renesas,rcar-gen3-pcie-ep";
> >> + reg = <0 0xfe000000 0 0x80000>,
> >> + <0x0 0xfe100000 0 0x100000>,
> >> + <0x0 0xfe200000 0 0x200000>,
> >> + <0x0 0x30000000 0 0x8000000>,
> >> + <0x0 0x38000000 0 0x8000000>;
> >> + reg-names = "apb-base", "memory0", "memory1", "memory2", "memory3";
> >> + resets = <&cpg 319>;
> >> + power-domains = <&sysc R8A774C0_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
> >> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 319>;
> >> + clock-names = "pcie";
> >> + max-functions = /bits/ 8 <1>;
> >> + };
> >> --
> >> 2.20.1
> >>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists