[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200122091250.2777221-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:12:50 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] scsi: ufs: fix spelling mistake "initilized" -> "initialized"
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
There is a spelling mistake in a pr_err message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
index dde2eb02f76f..cfe380348bf0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static inline bool ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info,
u8 lun)
{
if (!dev_info || !dev_info->max_lu_supported) {
- pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initilized\n");
+ pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initialized\n");
return false;
}
--
2.24.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists