linux-kernel - RE: [EXT] [PATCH][next] scsi: ufs: fix spelling mistake "initilized" -> "initialized"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:59:59 +0000
From:   "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        Pedro Sousa <pedrom.sousa@...opsys.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC:     "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH][next] scsi: ufs: fix spelling mistake "initilized"
 -> "initialized"

Hi, Colin
Thanks, this typo result from my patch, and I see Martin has mainlined in for-next branch, if martin doesn't need my update patches,
Add my reviewed-by tag, thanks again.

Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>

> 
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> There is a spelling mistake in a pr_err message. Fix it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h index
> dde2eb02f76f..cfe380348bf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static inline bool ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(struct
> ufs_dev_info *dev_info,
>  		u8 lun)
>  {
>  	if (!dev_info || !dev_info->max_lu_supported) {
> -		pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initilized\n");
> +		pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initialized\n");
>  		return false;
>  	}
> 
> --
> 2.24.0