[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f87c6ad-f114-30bb-8506-c32274ce2992@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:02:56 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] fpid_next should increase position index
if seq_file .next fuction does not change position index,
read after some lseek can generate unexpected output.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index ca25210..7c64b2b 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -7033,9 +7033,10 @@ static void *fpid_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
struct trace_array *tr = m->private;
struct trace_pid_list *pid_list = rcu_dereference_sched(tr->function_pids);
- if (v == FTRACE_NO_PIDS)
+ if (v == FTRACE_NO_PIDS) {
+ (*pos)++;
return NULL;
-
+ }
return trace_pid_next(pid_list, v, pos);
}
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists