[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8681248a-da16-5448-31fe-26df9e7cfc25@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:02:51 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] t_next should increase position index
if seq_file .next fuction does not change position index,
read after some lseek can generate unexpected output.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 9bf1f2c..ca25210 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -3442,8 +3442,10 @@ static void *t_mod_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
loff_t l = *pos; /* t_probe_start() must use original pos */
void *ret;
- if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled))
+ if (unlikely(ftrace_disabled)) {
+ (*pos)++;
return NULL;
+ }
if (iter->flags & FTRACE_ITER_PROBE)
return t_probe_next(m, pos);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists