linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf 2/4] selftests: bpf: ignore RST packets for reuseport tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:32:27 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>, Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 2/4] selftests: bpf: ignore RST packets for reuseport
 tests

On 1/24/20 10:00 AM, Lorenz Bauer wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 21:54, Martin Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
>>
>> btw, it needs a Fixes tag.
>>
>> Patch 4 and Patch 1 also need a Fixes tag.
> 
> This makes me wonder, should these go via bpf or bpf-next? Do I have
> to split the series then?

Lets do all of these for bpf-next since timing is very close before v5.5 release.
If needed, we can later have them picked up for 5.5 stable.

Thanks,
Daniel