[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2008374.irdbgypaU6@jernej-laptop>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:20:18 +0100
From: Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/8] clk: sunxi-ng: sun8i-de2: Swap A64 and H6 definitions
Hi!
Dne sobota, 25. januar 2020 ob 04:05:33 CET je Chen-Yu Tsai napisal(a):
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 7:20 AM Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
wrote:
> > For some reason, A64 and H6 have swapped clocks and resets definitions.
> > H6 doesn't have rotation unit while A64 has. Swap around to correct the
> > issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
>
> Could you add Fixes tags for this one?
I'm not sure which commit to reference. H6 one? or also initial A64 one?
I just found out that H5 compatible uses A64 structure, which is not correct.
H5 doesn't contain rotate core.
Do you have any better idea how to nicely solve this mess? I'm thinking that
for v2 I would first decouple some compatibles, like this for H5 and R40 and
V3s from A83T (as it can be seen in the next patch). After that, rather than
switching definitions I would fix each compatible one by one. At the end, if any
entry is duplicated, I can add one commit to merge same structures.
What do you think?
Best regards,
Jernej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists