[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200127212256.194310-1-ehankland@google.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2020 13:22:56 -0800
From: Eric Hankland <ehankland@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Hankland <ehankland@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Fix perfctr WRMSR for running counters
Correct the logic in intel_pmu_set_msr() for fixed and general purpose
counters. This was recently changed to set pmc->counter without taking
in to account the value of pmc_read_counter() which will be incorrect if
the counter is currently running and non-zero; this changes back to the
old logic which accounted for the value of currently running counters.
Signed-off-by: Eric Hankland <ehankland@...gle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 34a3a17bb6d7..9bdbe05b599c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -264,9 +264,10 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
pmc->counter = data;
else
pmc->counter = (s32)data;
+ pmc->counter += pmc->counter - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
return 0;
} else if ((pmc = get_fixed_pmc(pmu, msr))) {
- pmc->counter = data;
+ pmc->counter += data - pmc_read_counter(pmc);
return 0;
} else if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0))) {
if (data == pmc->eventsel)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists