linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] lkdtm/stackleak: Make the test more verbose

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200128075050.GC2105706@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:50:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        notify@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] lkdtm/stackleak: Make the test more verbose

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 03:15:08PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 02:58:44PM +0300, Alexander Popov wrote:
> > On 03.01.2020 02:49, Alexander Popov wrote:
> > > Make the stack erasing test more verbose about the errors that it
> > > can detect.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/misc/lkdtm/stackleak.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
> > >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > Pinging about this version of the patch.
> > 
> > Kees, it uses dump_stack() instead of BUG(), as we negotiated.
> 
> Yup, this is in my queue -- I've just gotten back from travelling and
> will get to it shortly. :)
> 
> Greg, feel free to take this directly if you want, too.

If I were to take it, it would have to wait until after 5.6-rc1, sorry.

thanks,

greg k-h