[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <41BBD985-4B3D-4F87-B69D-D8CFE6EC0EBE@lca.pw>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 06:20:29 -0500
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: sjpark@...zon.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>,
sj38.park@...il.com, acme@...nel.org, amit@...nel.org,
brendan.d.gregg@...il.com, corbet@....net, dwmw@...zon.com,
mgorman@...e.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, kirill@...temov.name,
brendanhiggins@...gle.com, colin.king@...onical.com,
minchan@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com, vdavydov@...allels.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Introduce Data Access MONitor (DAMON)
> On Jan 28, 2020, at 5:50 AM, sjpark@...zon.com wrote:
>
> For the comments from perf maintainers, I added Steven Rostedt and Arnaldo
> Carvalho de Melo first, but I might missed someone. If you recommend some more
> people, I will add them to recipients.
>
> I made DAMON as a new subsystem because I think no existing subsystem fits well
> to be a base of DAMON, due to DAMON's unique goals and mechanisms described
> below in the original cover letter.
>
> The existing subsystem that most similar to DAMON might be 'mm/page_idle.c'.
> However, there are many conceptual differences with DAMON. One biggest
> difference I think is the target. 'page_idle' deals with physical page frames
> while DAMON deals with virtual address of specific processes.
>
> Nevertheless, if you have some different opinion, please let me know.
I thought everyone should know to go to the MAINTAINERS file and search PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM.
It might be difficult but there is a perf subcommand for some subsystems like sched: tracing/measuring of scheduler actions and latencies.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists