| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <238f6f80-dc3e-3245-2fc0-a10e37e49a74@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:10:22 +0530
From: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/perf/metricgroup: Fix printing event names of
metric group with multiple events incase of overlapping events
On 1/27/20 9:11 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 12:17:21PM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 1 +
>> tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v1 -> v2
>> - Rather then adding static variable in metricgroup.c,
>> add a new variable in evlist itself with name 'evlist_iter'
>> ---
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
>> index f5bd5c386df1..255f872aee92 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.h
>> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ struct evlist {
>> bool enabled;
>> int id_pos;
>> int is_pos;
>> + int evlist_iter;
>> u64 combined_sample_type;
>> enum bkw_mmap_state bkw_mmap_state;
>> struct {
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> index 02aee946b6c1..911fab4ac04b 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
>> @@ -96,10 +96,13 @@ static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct evlist *perf_evlist,
>> struct evsel **metric_events)
>> {
>> struct evsel *ev;
>> - int i = 0;
>> + int i = 0, j = 0;
>> bool leader_found;
>>
>> evlist__for_each_entry (perf_evlist, ev) {
>> + j++;
>> + if (j <= perf_evlist->evlist_iter)
>> + continue;
> hm, but that won't work when event does not match and all
> is rolled over in th next condition, no?
Hi jiri,
Thanks for the review. Yes you are right. Need to take care of that
case.
>
> how about something like below.. I only checked I got same
> results as you did in the changelog, but haven't tested
> otherwise.. especially I think that the check I removed
> is redundant
>
> could you please also add test for this testcase?
>
> thanks,
> jirka
>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> index 02aee946b6c1..c12f3efccec8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/metricgroup.c
> @@ -93,13 +93,16 @@ struct egroup {
> static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct evlist *perf_evlist,
> const char **ids,
> int idnum,
> - struct evsel **metric_events)
> + struct evsel **metric_events,
> + bool used[])
> {
> struct evsel *ev;
> - int i = 0;
> + int i = 0, j = 0;
> bool leader_found;
>
> evlist__for_each_entry (perf_evlist, ev) {
> + if (used[j++])
> + continue;
> if (!strcmp(ev->name, ids[i])) {
> if (!metric_events[i])
> metric_events[i] = ev;
> @@ -107,22 +110,11 @@ static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct evlist *perf_evlist,
> if (i == idnum)
> break;
> } else {
> - if (i + 1 == idnum) {
> + if (i) {
> /* Discard the whole match and start again */
> i = 0;
> memset(metric_events, 0,
> sizeof(struct evsel *) * idnum);
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - if (!strcmp(ev->name, ids[i]))
> - metric_events[i] = ev;
> - else {
> - /* Discard the whole match and start again */
> - i = 0;
> - memset(metric_events, 0,
> - sizeof(struct evsel *) * idnum);
> - continue;
> }
Incase we have match miss, we need to restart the match comparison again.
But I think we can't totally remove this check as, we also need to make
sure we take current event in match logic. Maybe something like this:
} else {
- if (i + 1 == idnum) {
- /* Discard the whole match and start
again */
- i = 0;
- memset(metric_events, 0,
- sizeof(struct evsel *) * idnum);
- continue;
- }
-
- if (!strcmp(ev->name, ids[i]))
- metric_events[i] = ev;
- else {
- /* Discard the whole match and start
again */
- i = 0;
- memset(metric_events, 0,
- sizeof(struct evsel *) * idnum);
- continue;
+ /* Discard the whole match and start again */
+ i = 0;
+ memset(metric_events, 0,
+ sizeof(struct evsel *) * idnum);
+
+ if (!strcmp(ev->name, ids[i])) {
+ if (!metric_events[i])
+ metric_events[i] = ev;
+ i++;
+ if (i == idnum)
+ break;
}
Please let me know if it sounds fine.
Thanks,
Kajol
> }
> }
> @@ -144,9 +136,11 @@ static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct evlist *perf_evlist,
> !strcmp(ev->name, metric_events[i]->name)) {
> ev->metric_leader = metric_events[i];
> }
> + j++;
> }
> + ev = metric_events[i];
> + used[ev->idx] = true;
> }
> -
> return metric_events[0];
> }
>
> @@ -160,6 +154,9 @@ static int metricgroup__setup_events(struct list_head *groups,
> int ret = 0;
> struct egroup *eg;
> struct evsel *evsel;
> + bool used[perf_evlist->core.nr_entries];
> +
> + memset(used, 0, perf_evlist->core.nr_entries);
>
> list_for_each_entry (eg, groups, nd) {
> struct evsel **metric_events;
> @@ -170,7 +167,7 @@ static int metricgroup__setup_events(struct list_head *groups,
> break;
> }
> evsel = find_evsel_group(perf_evlist, eg->ids, eg->idnum,
> - metric_events);
> + metric_events, used);
> if (!evsel) {
> pr_debug("Cannot resolve %s: %s\n",
> eg->metric_name, eg->metric_expr);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists