Message-Id: <B12B959B-7504-4FC9-B7B7-7EB139049684@holtmann.org>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 09:40:57 +0100
From:   Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:     Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>
Cc:     Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
        Alain Michaud <alainm@...omium.org>,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        chromeos-bluetooth-upstreaming@...omium.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] Bluetooth: Update filters/whitelists for
 suspend

Hi Abhishek,

> When suspending, update the event filter for BR/EDR devices and the
> whitelist for LE devices. BR/EDR devices are added to the event filter
> and will auto-connect if found during suspend. For LE, we update the
> filter to remove everything that is not wakeable during suspend.
> Finally, we disconnect all connected devices and wait for that to
> complete before returning in the suspend notifier.
> 
> An example suspend flow with 1 BR/EDR HID device, 1 BR/EDR audio device,
> 1 LE HID device, 1 LE non-HID (where HIDs are wakeable):
> 
> PM_PREPARE_SUSPEND:
>  - Set event filter for BR/EDR HID device
>  - Clear anything from LE whitelist that is not wakeable
>  - Add (if not there) the LE HID device
>  - Disconnect all devices

is this really the right order? Why not disconnect all devices first. We are suspending after all, so lets disconnect first and then create the appropriate accept filters.

I have the feeling it would also make the overall logic a lot simpler since it fits more into the current model that is used internally for a lot of decision points (especially with LE).

> PM_POST_SUSPEND:
>  - Clear event filter
>  - Restore LE whitelist (deleting anything not in le_pend_conn or
>    le_pend_report and then adding from those lists)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Pandit-Subedi <abhishekpandit@...omium.org>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2:
> * Refactored filters and whitelist settings to its own patch
> * Refactored update_white_list to have clearer edge cases
> * Add connected devices to whitelist (previously missing corner case)
> 
> include/net/bluetooth/hci.h      |  17 +-
> include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |   5 +
> net/bluetooth/hci_event.c        |  28 ++-
> net/bluetooth/hci_request.c      | 308 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> net/bluetooth/mgmt.c             |   8 +
> 5 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> index 6293bdd7d862..720d8e633f7e 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci.h
> @@ -932,10 +932,14 @@ struct hci_cp_sniff_subrate {
> #define HCI_OP_RESET			0x0c03
> 
> #define HCI_OP_SET_EVENT_FLT		0x0c05
> -struct hci_cp_set_event_flt {
> -	__u8     flt_type;
> -	__u8     cond_type;
> -	__u8     condition[0];
> +#define HCI_SET_EVENT_FLT_SIZE		9
> +struct hci_cp_set_event_filter {
> +	__u8		flt_type;
> +	__u8		cond_type;
> +	struct {
> +		bdaddr_t bdaddr;
> +		__u8 auto_accept;
> +	} __packed	addr_conn_flt;
> } __packed;
> 
> /* Filter types */
> @@ -949,8 +953,9 @@ struct hci_cp_set_event_flt {
> #define HCI_CONN_SETUP_ALLOW_BDADDR	0x02
> 
> /* CONN_SETUP Conditions */
> -#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_OFF	0x01
> -#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON	0x02
> +#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_OFF		0x01
> +#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON		0x02
> +#define HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON_WITH_RS	0x03
> 
> #define HCI_OP_READ_STORED_LINK_KEY	0x0c0d
> struct hci_cp_read_stored_link_key {
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> index 74d703e46fb4..49eae4a802ac 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> @@ -91,6 +91,9 @@ struct discovery_state {
> #define SUSPEND_NOTIFIER_TIMEOUT	msecs_to_jiffies(2000) /* 2 seconds */
> 
> enum suspend_tasks {
> +	SUSPEND_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE,
> +	SUSPEND_DISCONNECTING,
> +
> 	SUSPEND_PREPARE_NOTIFIER,
> 	__SUSPEND_NUM_TASKS
> };
> @@ -406,6 +409,8 @@ struct hci_dev {
> 	struct work_struct	suspend_prepare;
> 	enum suspended_state	suspend_state_next;
> 	enum suspended_state	suspend_state;
> +	int			disconnect_counter;
> +	bool			freeze_filters;
> 
> 	wait_queue_head_t	suspend_wait_q;
> 	DECLARE_BITMAP(suspend_tasks, __SUSPEND_NUM_TASKS);
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> index 6ddc4a74a5e4..76d25b3f4c73 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> @@ -2474,6 +2474,7 @@ static void hci_inquiry_result_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> 	struct hci_ev_conn_complete *ev = (void *) skb->data;
> +	struct inquiry_entry *ie;
> 	struct hci_conn *conn;
> 
> 	BT_DBG("%s", hdev->name);
> @@ -2482,14 +2483,29 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> 
> 	conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ev->link_type, &ev->bdaddr);
> 	if (!conn) {
> -		if (ev->link_type != SCO_LINK)
> -			goto unlock;
> +		/* Connection may not exist if auto-connected. Check the inquiry
> +		 * cache to see if we've already discovered this bdaddr before.
> +		 * Create a new connection if it was previously discovered.
> +		 */
> +		ie = hci_inquiry_cache_lookup(hdev, &ev->bdaddr);
> +		if (ie) {
> +			conn = hci_conn_add(hdev, ev->link_type, &ev->bdaddr,
> +					    HCI_ROLE_SLAVE);
> +			if (!conn) {
> +				bt_dev_err(hdev, "no memory for new conn");
> +				goto unlock;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			if (ev->link_type != SCO_LINK)
> +				goto unlock;

We are not going to get SCO_LINK auto-connected and thus we should really have it done just for ACL links. I don’t have good proposal to structure this handling at the moment, but we need to clean this up a bit.

> -		conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ESCO_LINK, &ev->bdaddr);
> -		if (!conn)
> -			goto unlock;
> +			conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_ba(hdev, ESCO_LINK,
> +						       &ev->bdaddr);
> +			if (!conn)
> +				goto unlock;
> 
> -		conn->type = SCO_LINK;
> +			conn->type = SCO_LINK;
> +		}
> 	}
> 
> 	if (!ev->status) {
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> index 08908469c043..c930b9ff1cfd 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@
> #define HCI_REQ_PEND	  1
> #define HCI_REQ_CANCELED  2
> 
> +#define LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND	0x1
> +#define LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA	0x2
> +
> +#define LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_WINDOW		0x0012
> +#define LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_INTERVAL	0x0060
> +
> void hci_req_init(struct hci_request *req, struct hci_dev *hdev)
> {
> 	skb_queue_head_init(&req->cmd_q);
> @@ -654,6 +660,12 @@ void hci_req_add_le_scan_disable(struct hci_request *req)
> {
> 	struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> 
> +	/* Early exit if we've frozen filters for suspend*/

Please fix the coding style for comments. Extra space required between suspend and */

I also have the feeling that we should split BR/EDR from LE support. I think we can merge the BR/EDR support quicker since it is a lot simpler. Especially when it stands on its own.

> +	if (hdev->freeze_filters) {
> +		BT_DBG("Filters are frozen for suspend");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> 	if (use_ext_scan(hdev)) {
> 		struct hci_cp_le_set_ext_scan_enable cp;
> 
> @@ -670,23 +682,67 @@ void hci_req_add_le_scan_disable(struct hci_request *req)
> 	}
> }
> 
> -static void add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
> -			      struct hci_conn_params *params)
> +static void del_from_white_list(struct hci_request *req, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
> +				u8 bdaddr_type)
> +{
> +	struct hci_cp_le_del_from_white_list cp;
> +
> +	cp.bdaddr_type = bdaddr_type;
> +	bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, bdaddr);
> +
> +	BT_DBG("Remove %pMR (0x%x) from whitelist", &cp.bdaddr, cp.bdaddr_type);
> +	hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> +}
> +
> +/* Adds connection to white list if needed. On error, returns -1 */
> +static int add_to_white_list(struct hci_request *req,
> +			     struct hci_conn_params *params, u8 *num_entries,
> +			     u8 flags)
> {
> 	struct hci_cp_le_add_to_white_list cp;
> +	struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> +	bool allow_rpa = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA);
> +	bool suspend = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND);
> 
> +	/* Already in white list */
> +	if (hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->le_white_list, &params->addr,
> +				   params->addr_type))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Select filter policy to accept all advertising */
> +	if (*num_entries >= hdev->le_white_list_size)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	/* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> +	if (!allow_rpa &&
> +	    hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr, params->addr_type)) {
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* During suspend, only wakeable devices can be in whitelist */
> +	if (suspend && !hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->wakeable, &params->addr,
> +					       params->addr_type))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	*num_entries += 1;
> 	cp.bdaddr_type = params->addr_type;
> 	bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, &params->addr);
> 
> +	BT_DBG("Add %pMR (0x%x) to whitelist", &cp.bdaddr, cp.bdaddr_type);
> 	hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_ADD_TO_WHITE_LIST, sizeof(cp), &cp);
> +
> +	return 0;
> }
> 
> -static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
> +static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req, u8 flags)
> {
> 	struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> 	struct hci_conn_params *params;
> 	struct bdaddr_list *b;
> -	uint8_t white_list_entries = 0;
> +	u8 white_list_entries = 0;
> +	bool allow_rpa = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA);
> +	bool suspend = !!(flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND);
> +	bool wakeable, pend_conn, pend_report;
> 
> 	/* Go through the current white list programmed into the
> 	 * controller one by one and check if that address is still
> @@ -695,26 +751,42 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
> 	 * command to remove it from the controller.
> 	 */
> 	list_for_each_entry(b, &hdev->le_white_list, list) {
> -		/* If the device is neither in pend_le_conns nor
> -		 * pend_le_reports then remove it from the whitelist.
> +		wakeable = !!hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->wakeable, &b->bdaddr,
> +						    b->bdaddr_type);
> +		pend_conn = hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_conns,
> +						      &b->bdaddr,
> +						      b->bdaddr_type);
> +		pend_report = hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_reports,
> +							&b->bdaddr,
> +							b->bdaddr_type);
> +
> +		/* During suspend, we remove all non-wakeable devices
> +		 * and leave all others alone. Connected devices will be
> +		 * disconnected during suspend but may not be in the pending
> +		 * list yet.
> 		 */
> -		if (!hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_conns,
> -					       &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type) &&
> -		    !hci_pend_le_action_lookup(&hdev->pend_le_reports,
> -					       &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
> -			struct hci_cp_le_del_from_white_list cp;
> -
> -			cp.bdaddr_type = b->bdaddr_type;
> -			bacpy(&cp.bdaddr, &b->bdaddr);
> -
> -			hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_LE_DEL_FROM_WHITE_LIST,
> -				    sizeof(cp), &cp);
> -			continue;
> -		}
> +		if (suspend) {
> +			if (!wakeable) {
> +				del_from_white_list(req, &b->bdaddr,
> +						    b->bdaddr_type);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			/* If the device is not likely to connect or report,
> +			 * remove it from the whitelist.
> +			 */
> +			if (!pend_conn && !pend_report) {
> +				del_from_white_list(req, &b->bdaddr,
> +						    b->bdaddr_type);
> +				continue;
> +			}
> 
> -		if (hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr, b->bdaddr_type)) {
> 			/* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> -			return 0x00;
> +			if (!allow_rpa &&
> +			    hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &b->bdaddr,
> +						 b->bdaddr_type)) {
> +				return 0x00;
> +			}
> 		}
> 
> 		white_list_entries++;
> @@ -731,47 +803,30 @@ static u8 update_white_list(struct hci_request *req)
> 	 * white list.
> 	 */
> 	list_for_each_entry(params, &hdev->pend_le_conns, action) {
> -		if (hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->le_white_list,
> -					   &params->addr, params->addr_type))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (white_list_entries >= hdev->le_white_list_size) {
> -			/* Select filter policy to accept all advertising */
> +		if (add_to_white_list(req, params, &white_list_entries, flags))
> 			return 0x00;
> -		}
> -
> -		if (hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr,
> -					 params->addr_type)) {
> -			/* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> -			return 0x00;
> -		}
> -
> -		white_list_entries++;
> -		add_to_white_list(req, params);
> 	}
> 
> 	/* After adding all new pending connections, walk through
> 	 * the list of pending reports and also add these to the
> -	 * white list if there is still space.
> +	 * white list if there is still space. Abort if space runs out.
> 	 */
> 	list_for_each_entry(params, &hdev->pend_le_reports, action) {
> -		if (hci_bdaddr_list_lookup(&hdev->le_white_list,
> -					   &params->addr, params->addr_type))
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (white_list_entries >= hdev->le_white_list_size) {
> -			/* Select filter policy to accept all advertising */
> +		if (add_to_white_list(req, params, &white_list_entries, flags))
> 			return 0x00;
> -		}
> +	}
> 
> -		if (hci_find_irk_by_addr(hdev, &params->addr,
> -					 params->addr_type)) {
> -			/* White list can not be used with RPAs */
> -			return 0x00;
> +	/* Currently connected devices will be missing from the white list and
> +	 * we need to insert them into the whitelist if they are wakeable. We
> +	 * can't insert later because we will have already returned from the
> +	 * suspend notifier and would cause a spurious wakeup.
> +	 */
> +	if (suspend) {
> +		list_for_each_entry(params, &hdev->le_conn_params, list) {
> +			if (add_to_white_list(req, params, &white_list_entries,
> +					      flags))
> +				return 0x00;
> 		}
> -
> -		white_list_entries++;
> -		add_to_white_list(req, params);
> 	}

This goes to my point above. If we just disconnect everything, then the white list programming should be easily. Everything that is pending and have been elected for wakeup + incoming connection will be added. And then we are done. I don’t think much has to change except one extra check if wakeup is allowed or not.

> 
> 	/* Select filter policy to use white list */
> @@ -861,11 +916,26 @@ static void hci_req_start_scan(struct hci_request *req, u8 type, u16 interval,
> 	}
> }
> 
> -void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> +void __hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req, u8 flags)
> {
> 	struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> 	u8 own_addr_type;
> 	u8 filter_policy;
> +	u8 window, interval;
> +
> +	/* We allow whitelisting even with RPAs in suspend. In the worst case,
> +	 * we won't be able to wake from devices that use the privacy1.2
> +	 * features. Additionally, once we support privacy1.2 and IRK
> +	 * offloading, we can update this to also check for those conditions.
> +	 */
> +	if (flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND)
> +		flags |= LE_SCAN_FLAG_ALLOW_RPA;
> +
> +	/* Early exit if we've frozen filters for suspend */
> +	if (hdev->freeze_filters) {
> +		BT_DBG("Filters are frozen for suspend");
> +		return;
> +	}
> 
> 	/* Set require_privacy to false since no SCAN_REQ are send
> 	 * during passive scanning. Not using an non-resolvable address
> @@ -881,7 +951,8 @@ void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> 	 * happen before enabling scanning. The controller does
> 	 * not allow white list modification while scanning.
> 	 */
> -	filter_policy = update_white_list(req);
> +	BT_DBG("Updating white list with flags = %d", flags);
> +	filter_policy = update_white_list(req, flags);
> 
> 	/* When the controller is using random resolvable addresses and
> 	 * with that having LE privacy enabled, then controllers with
> @@ -896,8 +967,22 @@ void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> 	    (hdev->le_features[0] & HCI_LE_EXT_SCAN_POLICY))
> 		filter_policy |= 0x02;
> 
> -	hci_req_start_scan(req, LE_SCAN_PASSIVE, hdev->le_scan_interval,
> -			   hdev->le_scan_window, own_addr_type, filter_policy);
> +	if (flags & LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND) {
> +		window = LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_WINDOW;
> +		interval = LE_SUSPEND_SCAN_INTERVAL;

I think we just want this done via some hdev->suspended variable or similar.

> +	} else {
> +		window = hdev->le_scan_window;
> +		interval = hdev->le_scan_interval;
> +	}
> +
> +	BT_DBG("LE passive scan with whitelist = %d", filter_policy);
> +	hci_req_start_scan(req, LE_SCAN_PASSIVE, interval, window,
> +			   own_addr_type, filter_policy);
> +}
> +
> +void hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> +{
> +	__hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(req, 0);
> }
> 
> static u8 get_adv_instance_scan_rsp_len(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 instance)
> @@ -918,6 +1003,76 @@ static u8 get_adv_instance_scan_rsp_len(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 instance)
> 	return adv_instance->scan_rsp_len;
> }
> 
> +static void hci_req_clear_event_filter(struct hci_request *req)
> +{
> +	struct hci_cp_set_event_filter f;
> +
> +	memset(&f, 0, sizeof(f));
> +	f.flt_type = HCI_FLT_CLEAR_ALL;
> +	hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_SET_EVENT_FLT, 1, &f);
> +
> +	/* Update page scan state (since we may have modified it when setting
> +	 * the event filter).
> +	 */
> +	__hci_req_update_scan(req);
> +}
> +
> +static void hci_req_set_event_filter(struct hci_request *req)
> +{
> +	struct bdaddr_list *b;
> +	struct hci_cp_set_event_filter f;
> +	struct hci_dev *hdev = req->hdev;
> +	int filters_updated = 0;
> +	u8 scan;
> +
> +	/* Always clear event filter when starting */
> +	hci_req_clear_event_filter(req);
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(b, &hdev->wakeable, list) {
> +		if (b->bdaddr_type != BDADDR_BREDR)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		memset(&f, 0, sizeof(f));
> +		bacpy(&f.addr_conn_flt.bdaddr, &b->bdaddr);
> +		f.flt_type = HCI_FLT_CONN_SETUP;
> +		f.cond_type = HCI_CONN_SETUP_ALLOW_BDADDR;
> +		f.addr_conn_flt.auto_accept = HCI_CONN_SETUP_AUTO_ON;
> +
> +		BT_DBG("Adding event filters for %pMR", &b->bdaddr);
> +		hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_SET_EVENT_FLT, sizeof(f), &f);
> +
> +		filters_updated++;
> +	}

If we would use the wakeable list just for BR/EDR then the filters_updated++ would become redundant and we could just check if the list is empty.

> +
> +	scan = filters_updated ? SCAN_PAGE : SCAN_DISABLED;
> +	hci_req_add(req, HCI_OP_WRITE_SCAN_ENABLE, 1, &scan);
> +}
> +
> +static void hci_req_enable_le_suspend_scan(struct hci_request *req,
> +					   u8 flags)
> +{
> +	/* Can't change params without disabling first */
> +	hci_req_add_le_scan_disable(req);
> +
> +	/* Configure params and enable scanning */
> +	__hci_req_add_le_passive_scan(req, flags);
> +
> +	/* Block suspend notifier on response */
> +	set_bit(SUSPEND_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE, req->hdev->suspend_tasks);
> +}
> +
> +static void le_suspend_req_complete(struct hci_dev *hdev, u8 status, u16 opcode)
> +{
> +	BT_DBG("Request complete opcode=0x%x, status=0x%x", opcode, status);
> +
> +	/* Expecting LE Set scan to return */
> +	if (opcode == HCI_OP_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE &&
> +	    test_and_clear_bit(SUSPEND_LE_SET_SCAN_ENABLE,
> +			       hdev->suspend_tasks)) {
> +		wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> /* Call with hci_dev_lock */
> void hci_req_prepare_suspend(struct hci_dev *hdev, enum suspended_state next)
> {
> @@ -932,6 +1087,44 @@ void hci_req_prepare_suspend(struct hci_dev *hdev, enum suspended_state next)
> 
> 	hdev->suspend_state = next;
> 
> +	hci_req_init(&req, hdev);
> +	if (next == BT_SUSPENDED) {
> +		/* Enable event filter for existing devices */
> +		hci_req_set_event_filter(&req);
> +
> +		/* Enable passive scan at lower duty cycle */
> +		hci_req_enable_le_suspend_scan(&req, LE_SCAN_FLAG_SUSPEND);
> +
> +		hdev->freeze_filters = true;
> +
> +		/* Run commands before disconnecting */
> +		hci_req_run(&req, le_suspend_req_complete);
> +
> +		hdev->disconnect_counter = 0;
> +		/* Soft disconnect everything (power off)*/
> +		list_for_each_entry(conn, &hdev->conn_hash.list, list) {
> +			hci_disconnect(conn, HCI_ERROR_REMOTE_POWER_OFF);
> +			hdev->disconnect_counter++;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (hdev->disconnect_counter > 0) {
> +			BT_DBG("Had %d disconnects. Will wait on them",
> +			       hdev->disconnect_counter);
> +			set_bit(SUSPEND_DISCONNECTING, hdev->suspend_tasks);
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		hdev->freeze_filters = false;
> +
> +		hci_req_clear_event_filter(&req);
> +
> +		/* Reset passive/background scanning to normal */
> +		hci_req_enable_le_suspend_scan(&req, 0);
> +
> +		hci_req_run(&req, le_suspend_req_complete);
> +	}
> +
> +	hdev->suspend_state = next;
> +
> done:
> 	clear_bit(SUSPEND_PREPARE_NOTIFIER, hdev->suspend_tasks);
> 	wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q);
> @@ -2034,6 +2227,9 @@ void __hci_req_update_scan(struct hci_request *req)
> 	if (mgmt_powering_down(hdev))
> 		return;
> 
> +	if (hdev->freeze_filters)
> +		return;
> +
> 	if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_CONNECTABLE) ||
> 	    disconnected_whitelist_entries(hdev))
> 		scan = SCAN_PAGE;
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> index 58468dfa112f..269ce70e501c 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/mgmt.c
> @@ -7451,6 +7451,14 @@ void mgmt_device_disconnected(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr,
> 
> 	mgmt_event(MGMT_EV_DEVICE_DISCONNECTED, hdev, &ev, sizeof(ev), sk);
> 
> +	if (hdev->disconnect_counter > 0) {
> +		hdev->disconnect_counter--;
> +		if (hdev->disconnect_counter <= 0) {
> +			clear_bit(SUSPEND_DISCONNECTING, hdev->suspend_tasks);
> +			wake_up(&hdev->suspend_wait_q);
> +		}
> +	}
> +

I think this disconnect_counter is a bit racy. I would rather check that our connection hash is empty.

In addition, I have the feeling we better disable LE scanning BR/EDR page scan first. So that we clearly do not have any artifacts of accidental incoming connections.

The first step when going to suspend should clean the house

	1) Set a flag that all BR/EDR and LE connection attempts are rejected
	2) Disable BR/EDR page scan
	3) Disable LE advertising
	2) Disable LE scanning / BR/EDR inquiry
	4) Disconnect all

Now we have a clean house and we now prepare for wakeup triggers

	1) Clear flag and allow incoming connection
	2) Set BR/EDR event filter and enable page scan if needed
	3) Set LE whitelist and enable scanning if needed

When we wake up, then we also just need to reset the filters

	1) Clear BR/EDR event filter and enable page scan if needed
	2) Update LE white and enable scanning if needed
	3) Restore LE scanning / BR/EDR inquiry

Regards

Marcel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists