linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 24/28] ata: start separating SATA specific code from libata-scsi.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1h80e6tq1.fsf@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:46:46 -0500
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/28] ata: start separating SATA specific code from libata-scsi.c


Christoph,

> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 02:33:39PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> * include libata-scsi-sata.c in the build when CONFIG_SATA_HOST=y
>
> The libata-core.c vs libata-scsi.c split already is a bit weird, any
> reason not to simply have a single libata-sata.c?

I agree, I also tripped over libata-scsi-sata.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering