[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <267885.1580492989@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 17:49:49 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
James Morris <jamorris@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cred: Use RCU primitives to access RCU pointers
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com> wrote:
> > task_struct.cred and task_struct.real_cred are annotated by __rcu,
>
> task_struct.cred doesn't actually have RCU semantics though, see
> commit d7852fbd0f0423937fa287a598bfde188bb68c22. For task_struct.cred,
> it would probably be more correct to remove the __rcu annotation?
You're right, I think, there shouldn't be any need for __rcu on
task_struct::cred since it shouldn't be accessed on any task except current.
I've a feeling that there was something at the time, proc perhaps, but I don't
remember.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists