linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: fix a regression introduced by gpio_do_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Feb 2020 11:14:51 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: fix a regression introduced by
 gpio_do_set_config()

On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> 
> These three patches fix a regression introduced by commit d90f36851d65
> ("gpiolib: have a single place of calling set_config()"). We first need
> to revert patches that came on top of it, then apply the actual fix.
> 
> Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
>   Revert "gpiolib: Remove duplicated function gpio_do_set_config()"
>   Revert "gpiolib: remove set but not used variable 'config'"
>   gpiolib: fix gpio_do_set_config()
> 

For the series:

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.23.0
>