[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=McoG=uRJi0W+KV89bORNbGHOw7F=+hdbbEimANJGAYd7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 10:46:59 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] gpiolib: fix a regression introduced by gpio_do_set_config()
pon., 3 lut 2020 o 20:14 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> napisaĆ(a):
>
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> >
> > These three patches fix a regression introduced by commit d90f36851d65
> > ("gpiolib: have a single place of calling set_config()"). We first need
> > to revert patches that came on top of it, then apply the actual fix.
> >
> > Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
> > Revert "gpiolib: Remove duplicated function gpio_do_set_config()"
> > Revert "gpiolib: remove set but not used variable 'config'"
> > gpiolib: fix gpio_do_set_config()
> >
>
> For the series:
>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>
Applied the patches. I'll send them to Linus W shortly.
Bartosz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists