[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200204142718.GA23972@pauld.bos.csb>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 09:27:19 -0500
From: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
To: Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: sched_tick_remote: Remove duplicate
assignment
Hi Scott,
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:35:58PM -0500 Scott Wood wrote:
> A redundant "curr = rq->curr" was added; remove it.
>
> Fixes: ebc0f83c78a2 ("timers/nohz: Update NOHZ load in remote tick")
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 45f79bcc3146..377ec26e9159 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3683,7 +3683,6 @@ static void sched_tick_remote(struct work_struct *work)
> if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
> goto out_unlock;
>
> - curr = rq->curr;
> update_rq_clock(rq);
>
> if (!is_idle_task(curr)) {
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Out of curiosity, why remove this one and not the one right before the
cpu_is_offline check?
Cheers,
Phil
--
Powered by blists - more mailing lists