[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <590e957e57f2fd83e583450c358e3282e5493709.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 11:00:41 -0600
From: Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
To: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: sched_tick_remote: Remove duplicate
assignment
On Tue, 2020-02-04 at 09:27 -0500, Phil Auld wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:35:58PM -0500 Scott Wood wrote:
> > A redundant "curr = rq->curr" was added; remove it.
> >
> > Fixes: ebc0f83c78a2 ("timers/nohz: Update NOHZ load in remote tick")
> > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <swood@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 45f79bcc3146..377ec26e9159 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -3683,7 +3683,6 @@ static void sched_tick_remote(struct work_struct
> > *work)
> > if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
> > goto out_unlock;
> >
> > - curr = rq->curr;
> > update_rq_clock(rq);
> >
> > if (!is_idle_task(curr)) {
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
>
> Out of curiosity, why remove this one and not the one right before the
> cpu_is_offline check?
This was the one that was recently added by mistake.
-Scott
Powered by blists - more mailing lists