linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2,RESEND] MIPS: Scan the DMI system information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <081c8d68-35c4-2dc1-f73f-f5cf23cfaf27@loongson.cn>
Date:   Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:01:23 +0800
From:   Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To:     Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:     Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yinglu Yang <yangyinglu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2,RESEND] MIPS: Scan the DMI system information

On 2/5/20 10:55 AM, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>> On 2/3/20 8:14 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tiezhun,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 16:32:03 +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 1/16/20 9:26 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Enable DMI scanning on the MIPS architecture, this setups DMI identifiers
>>>>> (dmi_system_id) for printing it out on task dumps and prepares DIMM entry
>>>>> information (dmi_memdev_info) from the SMBIOS table. With this patch, the
>>>>> driver can easily match various of mainboards.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the SMBIOS reference specification, the table anchor string "_SM_" is
>>>>> present in the address range 0xF0000 to 0xFFFFF on a 16-byte boundary,
>>>>> but there exists a special case for Loongson platform, when call function
>>>>> dmi_early_remap, it should specify the start address to 0xFFFE000 due to
>>>>> it is reserved for SMBIOS and can be normally access in the BIOS.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch works fine on the Loongson 3A3000 platform which belongs to
>>>>> MIPS architecture and has no influence on the other architectures such
>>>>> as x86 and ARM.
>>>>>
>>>>> Co-developed-by: Yinglu Yang <yangyinglu@...ngson.cn>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yinglu Yang <yangyinglu@...ngson.cn>
>>>>> [jiaxun.yang@...goat.com: Refine definitions and Kconfig]
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> v2:
>>>>> - add SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START suggested by Jean
>>>>> - refine definitions and Kconfig by Jiaxun
>>>>>
>>>>> arch/mips/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>> arch/mips/include/asm/dmi.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/mips/kernel/setup.c | 2 ++
>>>>> drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c | 6 +++++-
>>>>> 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>> create mode 100644 arch/mips/include/asm/dmi.h
>>>> Hi Paul and Jean,
>>>>
>>>> How do you think this patch?
>>> Looks good to me and you can add:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
>>>
>>> for the dmi subsystem part.
>>>
>>>> Should I split it into the following two patches?
>>>> [PATCH v3 1/2] firmware: dmi: Add macro SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START
>>>> [PATCH v3 2/2] MIPS: Add support for Desktop Management Interface (DMI)
>>>>
>>>> The first patch is only related with the common dmi code
>>>> drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c, the other patch is only related
>>>> with the mips code under arch/mips.
>>>>
>>>> If you have any questions or suggestions, please let me know.
>>>> I am looking forward to your early reply.
>>> I'm fine either way. I you do not split it, as most changes are in the
>>> mips arch files and I do not expect any conflict in the dmi subsystem
>>> part, I believe that the patch should be merged by the mips arch
>>> maintainer.
>> Hi Jean,
>>
>> Thanks very much for your review.
>>
>> As described in another mail [1] by MIPS maintainer Paul Burton:
>>
>> "So if unmerged arch/mips/ patches are holding you up, ping me, but
>> preferrably make sure code being added actually belongs under arch/mips/
>> first."
>>
>> I think it is better to split it into the following two patches?
>> [PATCH v3 1/2] firmware: dmi: Add macro SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START
>> [PATCH v3 2/2] MIPS: Add support for Desktop Management Interface (DMI)
> Hi Tiezhu,
>
> That way will break bisect. In this case, I think the patch should still go through MIPS
> tree after grab review or ack from DMI maintainer.
>
> There is a grey margin for tree-wide patches, we should discuss how to deal with them case by
> case, for the email you mentioned, the main focus is platform driver.


Hi Jiaxun,


Sorry for the late reply.

I just saw your email a moment ago, and already sent the split v3 patch.

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1189713/

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1189714/

Let us wait and hear the opinion of Paul.


Hi Paul,

How do you think this case? One patch or two patches?

If one patch is better, I will send a v4 patch to make MIPS DMI config

depend on MACH_LOONGSON64.


Hi Jean,

Please do not merge the following patch until  we hear the opinion of Paul:

[PATCH v3,1/2] firmware: dmi: Add macro SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1189713/


Thanks,


Tiezhu Yang


>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
> Jiaxun Yang