lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <827e50c9-c847-0398-2820-46e210f0fc4d@web.de>
Date:   Wed, 5 Feb 2020 11:44:54 +0100
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jth@...nel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Naohiro Aota <Naohiro.Aota@....com>
Subject: Re: [v10 1/2] fs: New zonefs file system

>> I propose to define this array also as a completely immutable data structure.
>
> I understood that and pointed out that the added "const" does not change a thing.

Should the stored pointers be constants (besides the corresponding string literals)?


> I think that as is, it already is immutable.

Would you like to distinguish the scope for items in this variable a bit more?


Are any other software components similarly affected?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ