[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200205125804.GM14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:58:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5%
regression
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 08:32:16PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -5.5% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 81ec3f3c4c4d78f2d3b6689c9816bfbdf7417dbb ("perf/x86: Add check_period PMU callback")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
I'm fairly sure this bisect/result is bogus.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists