[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <831EE4E5E37DCC428EB295A351E6624952397CCF@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 03:04:19 +0000
From: "Li, Philip" <philip.li@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
CC: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lkp@...ts.01.org" <lkp@...ts.01.org>
Subject: RE: [LKP] Re: [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops
-5.5% regression
> Subject: [LKP] Re: [perf/x86] 81ec3f3c4c: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5.5%
> regression
>
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 08:32:16PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Greeting,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed a -5.5% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to
> commit:
> >
> >
> > commit: 81ec3f3c4c4d78f2d3b6689c9816bfbdf7417dbb ("perf/x86: Add
> check_period PMU callback")
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> >
>
> I'm fairly sure this bisect/result is bogus.
Hi Peter, thanks for feedback, we will investigate this in earliest time.
> _______________________________________________
> LKP mailing list -- lkp@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lkp-leave@...ts.01.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists