linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2,RESEND] MIPS: Scan the DMI system information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <2072641580972689@iva7-49db472ac642.qloud-c.yandex.net>
Date:   Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:04:49 +0800
From:   Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
To:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yinglu Yang <yangyinglu@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2,RESEND] MIPS: Scan the DMI system information



> On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:55:38 +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> 
>>> I think it is better to split it into the following two patches?
>>> [PATCH v3 1/2] firmware: dmi: Add macro SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START
>>> [PATCH v3 2/2] MIPS: Add support for Desktop Management Interface (DMI)
>>
>> That way will break bisect.
> 
> Are you sure? As far as I can see, each patch builds individually. The
> dmi patch is a no-op alone. The mips patch will not work alone,
> obviously, however according to Tiezhu dmi_scan_machine() will fail
> with a harmless error message if the base address is 0xF0000. If that's
> correct then it's not breaking bisect.

Sorry, I even forgot that it's my modification :-)
Just don't want to trouble maintainers so much.

> 
> --
> Jean Delvare
> SUSE L3 Support
--
Jiaxun Yang