[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOCk7Nr9n-xLtWq=LEM-QFhJcY+QOuzazsoi-yjErA9od2Jwmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:59:52 -0700
From: Jeffrey Hugo <jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com>
To: Harigovindan P <harigovi@...eaurora.org>
Cc: "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, nganji@...eaurora.org,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>, kalyan_t@...eaurora.org,
"Kristian H. Kristensen" <hoegsberg@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [v1] drm/msm/dsi/pll: call vco set rate explicitly
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 2:13 AM Harigovindan P <harigovi@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> For a given byte clock, if VCO recalc value is exactly same as
> vco set rate value, vco_set_rate does not get called assuming
> VCO is already set to required value. But Due to GDSC toggle,
> VCO values are erased in the HW. To make sure VCO is programmed
> correctly, we forcefully call set_rate from vco_prepare.
Is this specific to certain SoCs? I don't think I've observed this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists