[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51b4cd75-2b19-3e4d-7ead-409c77c44b70@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 20:09:47 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: yu kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, ming.lei@...hat.com,
chaitanya.kulkarni@....com, damien.lemoal@....com,
dhowells@...hat.com, asml.silence@...il.com, ajay.joshi@....com
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com, luoshijie1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: revert pushing the final release of request_queue
to a workqueue.
On 2020-02-06 03:10, yu kuai wrote:
> commit dc9edc44de6c ("block: Fix a blk_exit_rl() regression") pushed the
> final release of request_queue to a workqueue, witch is not necessary
> since commit 1e9364283764 ("blk-sysfs: Rework documention of
> __blk_release_queue").
I think the second commit reference is wrong. Did you perhaps want to
refer to commit 7b36a7189fc3 ("block: don't call ioc_exit_icq() with the
queue lock held for blk-mq")? That is the commit that removed the
locking from blk_release_queue() and that makes it safe to revert commit
dc9edc44de6c.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists