[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d253d904-fe37-c1cd-05f5-a02f7c5730d3@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 14:02:21 +0800
From: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<ming.lei@...hat.com>, <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>,
<damien.lemoal@....com>, <dhowells@...hat.com>,
<asml.silence@...il.com>, <ajay.joshi@....com>
CC: <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <zhangxiaoxu5@...wei.com>,
<luoshijie1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: revert pushing the final release of request_queue
to a workqueue.
On 2020/2/7 12:09, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> I think the second commit reference is wrong. Did you perhaps want to
> refer to commit 7b36a7189fc3 ("block: don't call ioc_exit_icq() with the
> queue lock held for blk-mq")? That is the commit that removed the
> locking from blk_release_queue() and that makes it safe to revert commit
> dc9edc44de6c.
Thank you for your response.
Commit 1e9364283764 just fix some comments, real funtional modification
should before that. And I do agree that commit 7b36a7189fc3 is the right
one.
By the way, do you agree the way I fix the CVE? I can send a V2 patch if
you do.
Thanks!
Yu Kuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists