linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/3] Revert "tracepoint: Use __idx instead of idx in DO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <13EE7A4B-38E7-4A41-AE42-C03B1898E947@goodmis.org>
Date:   Fri, 07 Feb 2020 16:07:58 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Richard Fontana <rfontana@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/3] Revert "tracepoint: Use __idx instead of idx in DO_TRACE macro to make it unique"

[Top posting as I'm replying from an airport gate, from my phone ]

Although you have a cover letter explaining the revert, each patch must be standalone, otherwise looking at git history won't have any explanation for the revert.

-- Steve


On February 7, 2020 3:56:54 PM EST, "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org> wrote:
>This reverts commit 0c7a52e4d4b5c4d35b31f3c3ad32af814f1bf491.
>
>Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
>---
> include/linux/tracepoint.h | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
>index 1fb11daa5c533..59463c90fdc3d 100644
>--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
>+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
>@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint
>*tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
> 		struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr;			\
> 		void *it_func;						\
> 		void *__data;						\
>-		int __maybe_unused __idx = 0;				\
>+		int __maybe_unused idx = 0;				\
> 									\
> 		if (!(cond))						\
> 			return;						\
>@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint
>*tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
> 		 * doesn't work from the idle path.			\
> 		 */							\
> 		if (rcuidle) {						\
>-			__idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu);\
>+			idx = srcu_read_lock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu);	\
> 			rcu_irq_enter_irqson();				\
> 		}							\
> 									\
>@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint
>*tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
> 									\
> 		if (rcuidle) {						\
> 			rcu_irq_exit_irqson();				\
>-			srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, __idx);\
>+			srcu_read_unlock_notrace(&tracepoint_srcu, idx);\
> 		}							\
> 									\
> 		preempt_enable_notrace();				\

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity and top posting.