linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2 V2] mfd: constify properties in mfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c4e85375e4204198a05236c2f48157f0@intel.com>
Date:   Sun, 9 Feb 2020 12:10:15 +0000
From:   "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2 V2] mfd: constify properties in mfd_cell


> 
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:58 PM Winkler, Tomas <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 8:44 PM Tomas Winkler
> > > <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > > wrote:
> 
> > > > V2: drop platform_device part
> > >
> > > Btw, when you prepare series, you may use -vX command line
> > > parameter, where X is a version number. The scripts will put v2 in
> > > each Subject line uniformly.
> > Right, just the second patch was a new one, so not sure I should mark it v2.
> 
> Yes, it evolved from the v1 of one patch. So, just mark both of them like
>   v2: per subsystem split from v1
> or alike.
Okay, we can look at that also this way.
Tomas