linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] mfd: constify properties in mfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 9 Feb 2020 14:08:42 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V2] mfd: constify properties in mfd_cell

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:58 PM Winkler, Tomas <tomas.winkler@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 8:44 PM Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> > wrote:

> > > V2: drop platform_device part
> >
> > Btw, when you prepare series, you may use -vX command line parameter,
> > where X is a version number. The scripts will put v2 in each Subject line
> > uniformly.
> Right, just the second patch was a new one, so not sure I should mark it v2.

Yes, it evolved from the v1 of one patch. So, just mark both of them like
  v2: per subsystem split from v1
or alike.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko