[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5464ab87-f711-4aa6-3f22-f27bf4819998@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:40:59 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Adam Serbinski <adam@...binski.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] ASoC: qdsp6: q6afe-dai: add support to pcm port
dais
On 10/02/2020 17:22, Adam Serbinski wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Why are we adding exactly duplicate function of q6afe_mi2s_set_sysclk
>> here?
>
> It isn't an exact duplicate.
>
> The reason I split off the new function is because the clock IDs for PCM
> overlap/duplicate the clock IDs for TDM, yet the parameters to
> q6afe_port_set_sysclk are not the same for PCM and TDM.
>
we should be able to use dai->id to make that decision.
--srini
>
>>> + SND_SOC_DAPM_AIF_IN("QUAT_PCM_RX", NULL,
>>> + 0, 0, 0, 0),
Powered by blists - more mailing lists