[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <616e3042f46cb7f052fc71e0ba4919a2@serbinski.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:22:25 -0500
From: Adam Serbinski <adam@...binski.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] ASoC: qdsp6: q6afe-dai: add support to pcm port
dais
On 2020-02-10 12:13, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Few minor comments
>
>> +static int q6afe_tdm_set_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
>> + int clk_id, unsigned int freq, int dir)
>> +{
>
> Why are we adding exactly duplicate function of q6afe_mi2s_set_sysclk
> here?
It isn't an exact duplicate.
The reason I split off the new function is because the clock IDs for PCM
overlap/duplicate the clock IDs for TDM, yet the parameters to
q6afe_port_set_sysclk are not the same for PCM and TDM.
>> + SND_SOC_DAPM_AIF_IN("QUAT_PCM_RX", NULL,
>> + 0, 0, 0, 0),
>
> This can be in single line, same for below
I will adjust these.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists