lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200210142532.432a0900bbacd6087349efe4@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:25:32 -0800
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Remove email address comment from email
 address comparisons

On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 10:52:16 -0800 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

> About 2% of the last 100K commits have email addresses that include an
> RFC2822 compliant comment like:
> 
> 	Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> 
> checkpatch currently does a comparison of the complete name and address
> to the submitted author to determine if the author has signed-off and
> emits a warning if the exact email names and addresses do not match.

Yes, I've seen this a few times.

> Unfortunately, the author email address can be written without the comment
> like:
> 
> 	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> 
> Add logic to compare the comment stripped email addresses to avoid this
> warning.

Where "stripped" means "after removing stuff in parentheses"?

Why do we consider the display name at all?  It's the
"peterz@...radead.org" part which matters for comparison purposes?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ