[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200211103931.GA26303@qmqm.qmqm.pl>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:39:31 +0100
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [[PATCH staging] 3/7] staging: wfx: fix init/remove vs IRQ race
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:23:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 09:46:54AM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > @@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ static void wfx_sdio_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
> > struct wfx_sdio_priv *bus = sdio_get_drvdata(func);
> >
> > wfx_release(bus->core);
> > - wfx_free_common(bus->core);
> > wfx_sdio_irq_unsubscribe(bus);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> This calls sdio_release_host(func);
>
> > + wfx_free_common(bus->core);
> > sdio_claim_host(func);
> > sdio_disable_func(func);
> > sdio_release_host(func);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> so is this a double free?
This is paired with sdio_claim_host() just above.
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
Powered by blists - more mailing lists