[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200211125232.GF1778@kadam>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:52:32 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [[PATCH staging] 3/7] staging: wfx: fix init/remove vs IRQ race
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:39:31AM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:23:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 09:46:54AM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > > @@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ static void wfx_sdio_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
> > > struct wfx_sdio_priv *bus = sdio_get_drvdata(func);
> > >
> > > wfx_release(bus->core);
> > > - wfx_free_common(bus->core);
> > > wfx_sdio_irq_unsubscribe(bus);
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > This calls sdio_release_host(func);
> >
> > > + wfx_free_common(bus->core);
> > > sdio_claim_host(func);
> > > sdio_disable_func(func);
> > > sdio_release_host(func);
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > so is this a double free?
>
> This is paired with sdio_claim_host() just above.
Ah... I misread wfx_sdio_irq_unsubscribe(), sorry.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists