[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <EA510462-A43C-4F7E-BFE8-B212003B3627@amacapital.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 16:12:19 -0800
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
Juergen Gross <JGross@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/62] x86/sev-es: Handle INVD Events
> On Feb 11, 2020, at 5:53 AM, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>
> Implement a handler for #VC exceptions caused by INVD instructions.
Uh, what? Surely the #VC code can have a catch-all OOPS path for things like this. Linux should never ever do INVD.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists