[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c931ed2-b03b-2e38-a10b-2d238e4b7a22@xilinx.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:42:11 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, git@...inx.com,
Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@...aro.org>,
Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: Fix unistd_32.h generation format
On 12. 02. 20 9:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 8:56 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com> wrote:
>>
>> Generated files are also checked by sparse that's why add newline
>> to remove sparse (C=1) warning:
>> ./arch/microblaze/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h:438:45:
>> warning: no newline at end of file
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@...inx.com>
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> The patch looks good, but if you don't mind respinning it, could respin
> it to do the same thing for all architectures at once? I see that some
> already have it, but most don't.
I have not a problem to do so. I expect that this can be taken via your
tree that I can create only one patch. If this should go via
architectures tree would be better to create separate one.
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists