linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Add support for multiple regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200212090356.x6aieuddym5zea5d@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:33:56 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Add support for multiple regulators

On 12-02-20, 16:57, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> I see... And you're right that it's probably best to change the
> voltages in a specific order (I just ignored that problem ,-P). I do
> wonder if there's something we could do in the core/DT to specify that
> order (if it's a simple order?), it's not really ideal to have to copy
> paste code around...

I will suggest adding your own version (like TI) for now, if we later
feel that there is too much duplicate code, we can look for an
alternative. But as of now, there aren't a lot of platforms using
multiple regulators anyway.

-- 
viresh