linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Add support for multiple regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANMq1KCut88owb2r5_uHi-k57io0T_D9ag0rf==UAEsqoH07eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:06:39 +0800
From:   Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Add support for multiple regulators

On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 5:04 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 12-02-20, 16:57, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > I see... And you're right that it's probably best to change the
> > voltages in a specific order (I just ignored that problem ,-P). I do
> > wonder if there's something we could do in the core/DT to specify that
> > order (if it's a simple order?), it's not really ideal to have to copy
> > paste code around...
>
> I will suggest adding your own version (like TI) for now, if we later
> feel that there is too much duplicate code, we can look for an
> alternative. But as of now, there aren't a lot of platforms using
> multiple regulators anyway.

Will do. Thanks!

> --
> viresh