[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c4b900ee-743e-8ce0-1061-02c383bff90e@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 14:36:32 +0530
From: vishnu <vravulap@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao
<Vishnuvardhanrao.Ravulapati@....com>
Cc: Alexander.Deucher@....com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
Akshu Agrawal <akshu.agrawal@....com>,
Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@....com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
"moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM..."
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: amd: Buffer Size instead of MAX Buffer
On 11/02/20 9:08 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:42:28PM +0530, Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao wrote:
>
>> Because of MAX BUFFER size in register,when user/app give small
>> buffer size produces noise of old data in buffer.
>> This patch rectifies this noise when using different
>> buffer sizes less than MAX BUFFER.
>
> In what way does this patch fix the issue? I looks like it's moving a
> buffer size setting from DMA to I2S but it's not clear why or how this
> fixes the issue, or indeed what the actual issue that's causing what are
> presumably underruns is?
>
prior to this fix the value in Tx/Rx Ring Buffer Size register
ACP_BT_TX_RINGBUFSIZE,ACP_BT_RX_RINGBUFSIZE and same in I2S RINGBUFSIZE
registers was statically set to maximum which is wrong.
Buffer size must be equal to actual allocated.
Due to which When I play any audio:aplay -Dhw:2,0 test.wav and then stop
and play aplay -Dhw:2,0 -c2 -fS16_LE -r48000 /dev/zero
--buffer-size=2048 I hear some part of old audio.
So after adding above fix the issue is not reproduced.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists