[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200212104902.GA3664@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 10:49:03 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the module name to be consistent
with older kernel
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:37:20PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> Commit cd221bd24ff5 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Allow building as a module")
> introduced a side effect that changed the module name from arm-smmu to
> arm-smmu-mod. This breaks the users of kernel parameters for the driver
> (e.g. arm-smmu.disable_bypass). This patch changes the module name back
> to be consistent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/Makefile | 4 ++--
> drivers/iommu/{arm-smmu.c => arm-smmu-common.c} | 0
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> rename drivers/iommu/{arm-smmu.c => arm-smmu-common.c} (100%)
Can't we just override MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX instead of renaming the file?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists