[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADRPPNQ-FcA-xdjp02ybsYeU9UFxCZU5dpf0wHThTmLHcjovCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:59:46 -0600
From: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the module name to be consistent with
older kernel
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:50 AM Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:37:20PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> > Commit cd221bd24ff5 ("iommu/arm-smmu: Allow building as a module")
> > introduced a side effect that changed the module name from arm-smmu to
> > arm-smmu-mod. This breaks the users of kernel parameters for the driver
> > (e.g. arm-smmu.disable_bypass). This patch changes the module name back
> > to be consistent.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/Makefile | 4 ++--
> > drivers/iommu/{arm-smmu.c => arm-smmu-common.c} | 0
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > rename drivers/iommu/{arm-smmu.c => arm-smmu-common.c} (100%)
>
> Can't we just override MODULE_PARAM_PREFIX instead of renaming the file?
I can do that. But on the other hand, the "mod" in the module name
arm-smmu-mod.ko seems to be redundant and looks a little bit weird.
Wouldn't it be cleaner to make it just arm-smmu.ko?
Regards,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists